The Guardian has published an article written by Moira Danigan from the United States about the first debate between the US presidential candidates, Donald Trump, and his Democratic rival, Joe Biden.
Moira says America is in pain and the debate has done nothing for her. Within 90 minutes, instead of listening to a serious discussion about the emergency crises that have ruined their lives, they saw three old white men – Donald Trump, Joe Biden and Fox News journalist Chris Wallace, who was appointed as a debate moderator – quarreling and insulting each other.
And the writer remembers that Trump referred in his speech to many conspiracy theories spread among the right on the Internet, without anyone understanding them unless he was an expert in this world.
And you think the most populous period in the debate was when Biden spoke about serving his deceased son, Beau, in the military, then Trump interrupted him by talking about his other son, Hunter, who had drug abuse problems.
The writer believes the job of the former vice president was very difficult, as he was not able to complete a single idea in the face of Trump’s repeated attacks, and he said: “It is difficult to take anything from this clown.”
She adds that Biden described Trump as the clown more than once and he meant that, deliberately looking at the camera and not at his opponent or the debating director.
She says that this method cures Ghaleel because he did not treat Trump with the respect and tact that he did not deserve. She adds that Biden dealt with Trump with disregard, befitting him to mention the way Hillary Clinton dealt with him. She gave up her tact and patience in debates with him.
The writer concludes by saying that the circus of vanity, lies and hostility has not revealed anything new about the candidates, and it is ridiculous to claim that it contributes to the advancement of democracy, but that it has reached a new peak in national embarrassment.
‘Rapprochement is futile’
The Financial Times published an article by Sylvain Chasani describing the rapprochement between French President Emmanuel Macron and his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, as pointless.
Sylvain says he must tell one of the French President, Emmanuel Macron, that the “confidence building dialogue” he started with the Russian president did not come from him.
The suspected nerve gas poisoning Alexei Navalny is perhaps the last nail in the coffin of this dead initiative despite its good intentions, but the French president seems to believe it can be saved.
The writer recalls that the French president wrote, weeks before the Russian opposition fell into a coma, that the dialogue he started with the Russian president in 2019 is progressing and that he will travel to Russia soon. She sees Navalny’s poisoning and the protests in Belarus that make him review his decision.
Sylvain says that the dialogue with Putin did not bring anything to neither France nor Europe, Russia protected the regime of President Bashar al-Assad, which France demanded his departure, and in Belarus it helps President Lukashenko against the legitimate protests, then came the poisoning of the opposition, Navalny.
She adds that a phone call that took place last month between the Elysee and the Kremlin left a bad impression on the French, if the information leaked by Le Monde newspaper was correct, as the information states that Putin, the former KGB officer, repeated to his French counterpart that Navalny had poisoned himself, and nerve gas came from Lithuania, The country that houses the leader of the Belarusian opposition, Zvetlana Tikanovskaya.
The writer believes that the French President does not want to give up three years of personal investment. Shortly after his election in 2017, despite being hacked during his election campaign, Putin invited him to Versailles. There is a school of thought in France that believes that rapprochement with Putin is the price that should be paid to avoid the China-Russia axis.
She says that the question is not related to whether France will cut its relations with Russia, because it will not do and it does not have to. Rather, Macron should think carefully before continuing to personally invest in a relationship that did not bear fruit and caused deep tension in Europe.
“Savior or villain”
The Daily Telegraph newspaper published an article in which Ambrose Iavans Pritchard talks about Chinas role in the climate change crisis and the solutions offered.
Ambrose says Xi Jinping’s pursuit of world leadership in climate change could make sense if China weren’t opening a new coal mine every two weeks and not raising its coal capacity each year by more than the total capacity of the rest of the world.
Meanwhile, China is positioning itself as a world leader in renewable energies and electric vehicles. The author believes that the primary motivation for this is to expand the global spread of the “Made in China” brand, and not to reduce the impact of climate change. An electric car that takes its energy from coal, according to the writer, is more polluting to the atmosphere than a diesel-powered Volkswagen. China, as he put it, is the world leader in the “clean technology war” and in the “polluted nationalism” race.
Ambrose recalls that Xi dared to present his plan to completely eliminate greenhouse gas emissions to the United States, which stipulates that no new coal mine will be opened anywhere in the world.
The United States replied to him that China is the largest source of gas emissions, the largest source of waste in the seas, and the largest practitioner of illegal fishing in the world. It is also the largest consumer of contraband natural products. Nevertheless, Xi’s image in the media is positive.
The writer says that the goal announced by China to reach the peak of greenhouse gas emissions in 2030 and the zero point in 2060 does not meet the purpose in terms of climate change.
He believes that China will inevitably reach zero gas emissions in 2060, not because something wanted to do so, but rather that is the logic of technological transformation and the cost of energy production.
These were the details of the news US elections 2020: America is “agonizing and the presidential debate did… for this day. We hope that we have succeeded by giving you the full details and information. To follow all our news, you can subscribe to the alerts system or to one of our different systems to provide you with all that is new.
It is also worth noting that the original news has been published and is available at eg24.news and the editorial team at AlKhaleej Today has confirmed it and it has been modified, and it may have been completely transferred or quoted from it and you can read and follow this news from its main source.
social experiment by Livio Acerbo #greengroundit #thisisnotapost #thisisart